Landau v. Corp. of Haverford Coll., U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225714 (Pa. Eastern Dist. Ct., December 13, 2024) (McHugh, J.)
This federal case discusses when property pseudonym names is under the authority of Megless 654f 3d. at 408. In this case Defendants did not oppose use of pseudonym names. Motions granted in part. HJSB and HJSC may continue under the respect to pseudonyms but within five days of the Order, Plaintiff must clarify whether they are parties or nonparty witnesses. If they are not parties, they will be stricken from the amended complaint. If they are parties, their identities must be disclosed at this time. Within five days of the entry of this Order HJSB and HJSC shall provide their actual names to the court by filing a notice under seal. Plaintiff’s actual names shall be revealed exclusively to counsel and have reference to employees directly involved in defense of this Action.
